|
Good evening
ladies and gentlemen. It is a great pleasure to be back in
Jamaica. It has been almost exactly a year since I departed
and I have missed the country and my friends here greatly.
It reminds me of the Shakespeare sonnet in which the Bard
in essence said: "We value not what we have until it is lost."
I enjoyed my time in your country, and I thank all Jamaicans
for their cordial welcome of my family and me.
I am pleased to see Vice-Chancellor Professor Nigel Harris,
Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Elsa Leo Rhynie, and Chairman
of the Mona Campus Council, Mr. William Clark here tonight.
Thank you for coming.
I want to thank Mr. Pereira and his team at the deputy principal's
office for collaborating with the American Friends of Jamaica
and the Cobb family and making this event possible. I will
explain the AFJ/Cobb family award in a moment.
I would also like to thank Monica Ladd and the AFJ for the
great work that they do and for their support in this effort.
I am so proud to be a member of the AFJ organization and am
pleased AFJ wanted to join Chuck and me and the University
in developing this lecture series.
I also want to thank Dr. Winston De La Haye - Chairman of
the Scholarship Committee of the Jamaican Fulbright-Humphry
Alumni Association who has been very helpful to me in putting
together the details of this event.
Additionally, we convey appreciation to the U.S. Embassy Office
of Public Affairs, Mr. Glenn Guimond and Ms. Angela Harvey.
I do not want to miss the opportunity to extend respectful
greetings - and - God Speed - to three of Jamaica's greatest
leaders.
- The
Most Honorable Edward Seaga
- The
Most Honorable P.J. Patterson
- The
Most Honorable Governor General Sir Howard Cooke and Lady
Cooke
Also
- of course - I wish to extend my warmest congratulations
to Dr. The Honorable Kenneth Hall - one of UWI's own - Jamaica's
next Governor General.
You are going to hear some familiar themes from me tonight.
I don't think you will find any surprises. In many ways my
comments on the AFJ/Cobb Family Lecture Series are - in and
of themselves - my reflections as Ambassador. But let me just
say this as a preface: You have affected me deeply. Living
here had a real impact on my life. Much of it is personal,
but in many ways I think it relates directly to what I am
going to talk about tonight - the critical importance of the
hard and constant debate of ideas and ideals.
First, just to quickly catch up on a personal note - since
many of you have inquired about what I am doing now - after
leaving your shores … Well … I have 7 grandchildren - so I
decided I would not travel and live abroad again. (And besides,
where was I going to find a place better to live and work
than Jamaica?) So, when Florida's Governor Jeb Bush asked
me to return to government in my home state - as Florida's
Secretary of State - my husband Chuck and I decided the answer
was yes.
This job as Secretary of State is not without its challenges.
The Department of State in Florida does not conduct foreign
policy - that is the province of the United States Department
of State. However, Florida's Department of State involves
a very broad portfolio of state interests covering corporations
and other business associations, all statewide cultural affairs
and historical resources, all state library facilities, the
state's large information services division, and importantly
- and most controversial - the Division of Elections. For
better or worse, I am the Chief Elections Officer for the
state. So that is what I am doing now, though I am still very
much in a learning mode about my responsibilities and serving
Florida's 17 million citizens in all of these diverse areas.
Be assured, however, that while we do not formulate foreign
policy, the state has a very strong international outreach
in which I will be involved, and as time permits, I intend
to continue "Building Bridges" between the State of Florida
and Jamaica. Let me explain to you exactly why I am here tonight;
why we are launching a lecture series at UWI; and what the
objective is. The other Ambassador Cobb - Chuck Cobb - and
I have long been involved in educational endeavors in Florida
at most every level. We did a little outreach in that area
while I was here the last few years. When we left Jamaica
we wanted to continue to support educational efforts. Toward
that end, we created two scholarship funds that will support
Jamaican students who meet the institutions' academic criteria.
One is at the University of Miami, named by my husband: "The
Ambassador Sue Cobb Scholarship," which is an endowed fund
from which interest earnings will be available annually to
supplement a Jamaican student's attendance at this excellent
private university. Another fund was created here at the University
of the West Indies. It is administered by the Office of Student
Financing and also uses interest income to help offset a needy
student's educational costs. Thirdly, we joined with AFJ and
Mr. Pereira's office to establish a lecture series here at
UWI.
The intent of the AFJ-Cobb Family Lecture Series is to provide
a public forum for a talented UWI researcher - selected by
his peers - to present his academic findings on an important
topic relating to Jamaica's future. Specifically, we seek
to reward creative and innovative research into leadership
strategies for the future - - marinated here in the Jamaican
context. We wish to encourage debate that will capture the
imagination of Jamaica's youth as they look to the decades
ahead living on this beautiful, resource-rich island. We want
to encourage "thinking outside the box" and envisioning Jamaica's
future.
Nobody in this universe has missed the fact that the world
changed drastically as we moved into the first decade of the
21st Century. It could not have been made more clear to me
than during the time I lived in Jamaica - starting with my
first day on the job at the U.S. Embassy: September 11, 2001.
Then over the course of the next few years watching the rapid
growth of technological capability, reading and seeing real
time reports from far off corners of the world that many people
never knew existed; watching the development of security technology,
financial systems, healthcare technology, medical advances,
and all kinds of communication enhancements…while simultaneously
watching rapidly changing political environments, nations
undergoing fundamental changes, the future being melded. There
is no doubt we live in a time of change. Speaking of political
changes, both the United States and Jamaica have important
elections on the horizon, so we can count on more change.
Given all this, given the current political world and the
current economic world, each country has to ask:
- How
do we take advantage of the new technologies now available?
- What
is going to be the next big technological change?
- How
can we be the ones to develop the next new technology?
- How
do we help leaders think about new and different ways to
handle developmental issues?
- How
do we ensure that our leaders have available in-depth analysis
by our countries' brightest minds that will allow those
leaders to look forward - around the corners - into our
future, into Jamaica's future?
- How
can Jamaica best join with its neighbors to ensure the success
of the Caribbean Single Market Economy?
- Who
is going to shape the research on a common agricultural
policy? Who can and should be in the future the sugar producers
for the region?
- How
will jobs lost be replaced?
- What
planning can be done for more efficient inter-Caribbean
transport systems?
- How
and who is going to develop an equitable tax policy for
the CSME with its unique and disparate nations?
- Should
there be centers for formulation of common policies in specific
socio-economic areas? Which areas? Where will such centers
be located?
- What
will take the place of lost revenues in those countries
that rely heavily on import duties?
- How
can we best keep children in school and provide affordable
options for their higher education that will ensure a vital
economy?
- In
your new and expanding regional context, how do you envision
a Jamaica of 2010 or 2020 that will work for all Jamaicans?
Simply put: how do you envision the Jamaica of the future?
Now we
know that much thought and considerable research has been
dedicated to several of these questions, but we still believe
that the best minds at work at this University can further
help to spark the dynamism of Jamaican youth and help inform
the leaders of the future.
The AFJ-Cobb Lecture is not, I repeat not, a debate on politics
- it is a quest to reward thoughtful, articulate, comprehensive
options that can be debated and exercised by your elected
leadership to positively affect the future of Jamaica.
There are thorny issues in our world. Our hope is that some
of the research and some of the recommendations made are provocative
enough to excite minds and to stir national debate.
We also hope the media will become involved and will share
and encourage thoughtful comments on the research presented
here by UWI academicians. Monica, maybe you can help on that!
U.S. President William Jefferson Clinton in a retrospective
delivered at Hofstra University last November on two terms
as leader of our country, effectively said that it is the
debate of ideas and ideals in our societies that inform the
proper exercise of government. The worst case scenario, he
suggested, is to get people to stop thinking; to cling to
the past; to hold to ideological rigidity; to avoid taking
on the toughest new challenges; to stop debating the way forward
to a nation's future. I know that President George W. Bush
shares those same thoughts. In fact he made a statement to
that exact effect just this morning in Washington at a White
House briefing.
Let me go to just a couple of areas we might all be thinking
about in this new and complex world. In making some suggestions,
please understand that I no longer speak for the United States.
These are purely personal thoughts.
Let's look at the economies of our hemisphere for a moment.
There is much to study and much to learn. By most accounts
the Western Hemisphere will see another year of solid growth.
Regional economic growth totaled 4.3% in 2005 and is expected
to approach 4.1% in 2006. Good growth should hold, too, in
the United States - in fact, the same should largely be true
globally.
However, much of the 2005 and 2006 growth in this hemisphere
will properly be attributed, not to internal reforms creating
growth or to foreign direct investment, but to the rising
external demand for commodity exports such as copper and oil.
If you were to back out the commodity figures, the GDP growth
scenario in this hemisphere is less optimistic.
Nor should remittances be confused with economic growth. Remittances
do not create jobs. Countries in this region should undoubtedly
be looking for creative ways to spur economic development
from remittances - which, I know Jamaica is already doing
-- but surely provocative UWI research could bring forth new
ideas relating to this important flow of funds.
In this relatively prosperous environment, if we look more
closely, we see the huge economies of China, India, Brazil,
and Russia developing rapidly and, of course, continued growth
in South Korea, Malaysia and other Asian countries. All are
advancing more rapidly than most countries in our own region.
If you have not heard this new acronym in the global economic
lexicon, you soon will: It is BRIC, or it could be CIRB, or
it could even be CRIB. It is China, India, Russia, and Brazil
- the big economies that are growing rapidly and will dramatically
change the world we live in.
Clearly, most of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean
are moving more slowly. I think we can probably agree that
most still need to address structural changes in their economic
practices and in their government processes. Even more, some
economists suggest, to face the challenges of the future will
require changing the mindset of the people. As challenging
as structural changes have been in former decades, the latter
requires years of concentration and education. Perhaps this
is an area worthy of further research.
Another area that everyone seems to agree on for development
and wealth creation is continuing to encourage entrepreneurships
and small business creation. This is an area where your neighbor
to the north, Florida, excels. Florida leads the nation in
new business entity filings and since I now head our division
of corporations in Florida, I know that this last year Florida
registered 278,576 new business entities. That is the highest
in the nation by a significant factor -- more than the larger
states of California, New York, and Texas. Florida also has
the lowest unemployment rate in the United States at 3.3%.
Moreover, Florida is recognized as the most commercially active
state or province in North America. Each year we have almost
a million business entity annual report filings covering corporations,
limited liability companies, and limited partnerships. Now,
I admit that Florida is a pretty good-sized economy. But I
still ask: What can UWI researchers do to help in guiding
development of sustainable small business growth and entrepreneurial
success?
Speaking of small businesses reminds me of the recent World
Bank report called "Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs,"
which looks at the unrealistically high taxes and cumbersome
payment procedures imposed by some countries. The statistics
are rather startling. In one Western Hemisphere country, a
domestic company with less than 100 employees would have to
pay 148% of its annual profits to the state if it complied
with all the tax laws. In a neighboring country, 98% of that
company's profits would go to the state. China's take is 47%.
In the US, it is 21%.
In Bolivia, according to the World Bank, accountants spend
an average of 1,110 hours a year to pay taxes for a medium-size
domestic firm. In Brazil it is 2,600 hours a year; in Venezuela
- 900. In the US and South Korea it takes about 300 hours.
That's still a lot. And listen to this: since 2001 when Russia
enacted significant tax cuts and simplified payment procedures,
the country has been increasing tax collection by an average
of 14% a year. Amazing! Now, I know Jamaica is very much attuned
to these facts and figures -- and I am definitely not advocating
a specific government policy here -- but, it seems it would
be a fascinating area of study.
Let's also look at some successful small countries. We know
that several nations have extraordinary gross domestic products
although their population is not large and they are not necessarily
well endowed with natural resources. We can look at Iceland,
Luxembourg, Denmark, Switzerland and Ireland - and some emerging
nations like Estonia. What lesson should the rest of the world
learn from these small states?
Richard W. Brahn in a September 2005 Washington Times article
found common threads in obtaining rapid growth. He prioritized
the factors - and this is not new to any of you - as establishing
the rule of law; protecting private property, creating a sound
currency, and liberalizing trade. Estonia, Brahn relates,
removed most price controls, discarded old regulations, privatized
most state owned enterprises and established a free trade
regime. The result has been the largest percentage increase
in per capita income of any of the former communist states.
Former Prime Minister and now current Foreign Minister, David
Oddsson of Iceland, a country about which I know a great deal,
essentially followed the same economic strategy in his country,
resulting in an extraordinarily dynamic economy. Iceland engaged
in a massive tax reduction (cutting corporate taxes from 50%
to 18% and inheritance tax to a maximum of 5%). Yet government
revenues have steadily increased and the national debt has
been reduced from 50% of GDP to only 15%.
Switzerland's experience is different and interesting. It
suggests that having most government power at the local level
reduces friction among the various groups that make up that
country's population. In a brief on the Swiss system presented
by Professor Victoria Curzon-Price, at the University of Geneva,
the argument was made that the splitting of political units
into tiny elements provides a huge gain in terms of the legitimacy
of the state. She postulates that a "state" obtains obedience
in one of three ways: repression, bribery, or consent. Most
modern democratic states end up using -- and abusing -- the
second of these -- with the political class bribing marginal
voters to maintain power. "Repression and bribery are costly,"
she continued, "but neither is needed if the government can
obtain the willing consent of the governed which - in the
Swiss context - is best obtained by direct democracy within
small political units." The resulting competition among the
cantons, she concluded, increased efficiency and productivity,
thereby spurring growth.
We could also look technology. Many believe that fostering
technological change will be the main driving force for long-term
growth. Of course, this calls for sustained increases in expenditures
for education and research. But growth examples abound in
this field and research opportunities are limitless.
Let me just give you a couple of examples that I am aware
of. These are in the security field. It is well known that
the current generation of facial recognition technology, which
has advantages over fingerprinting, has limitations. Several
companies are now researching and preparing to come out with
a new 3D version. They will make money.
There is tremendous growth in the area of Continuous Data
Protection, which is critical to businesses surviving natural
or man made disasters by backing up all data and applications
so business can be resumed quickly.
Investment in voice verification biometrics has been growing
steadily as investors have seen increasing returns on investment.
Voice verification biometrics is expected -- according to
one source -- to be growing at a rate of 50% a year for the
next five years.
There is no reason in the world that an attentive Jamaican
researcher can't identify and work on the next big tech break-through,
or to help shape Jamaican's vision for the future in the field
of technology.
Now I know that Jamaica has selected or is studying and is
implementing several of the aforementioned approaches. Disturbingly
though, I recently read in one of your two top newspapers
- and this surprised me - that if you go back a few decades
you would not find a comprehensive analysis of Jamaica's economy
and that there is "academic silence" in this area. This has
not, of course, prevented ideas from popping up and being
touted, but, said the writer of the piece, the ideas are "like
a doctor who prescribes a course of treatment without first
conducting a diagnosis of the patient." Happily, I also recently
read that a new initiative has been launched called the Target
Growth Competitiveness Committee. A group of leading economists
and social scientists are coming together to provide well-considered
views that are reflective of careful, in-depth analysis of
the state of the Jamaican economy and will identify trends
and ideas that will take the country into its future. That
sounds like a good idea to me, and it would seem to make sense
that the scholars of the University of the West Indies watch
carefully, and participate, and add to the research, the dialogue,
and the vision.
Let me conclude with the definition of a word "vision." "Vision"
is one's ability to "see" a plan for the future, to turn this
plan in a direction which leads to action and this action
ultimately provides a pathway to success. It has been said
that "Man can only live by looking to the future and this
is the salvation to his existence." And vision must be "end"
related. It must be clearly detailed, positive, inspiring,
and challenge people to grow. It must be worthy of support
from a nation's citizens.
We hope to see AFJ/Cobb Family lectures with visions of Jamaica's
future.
Back to Main Press Page.
|